Pick a better naming schema for association views
Reported by Yurii Rashkovskii | April 29th, 2008 @ 10:20 AM | in 0.0.3
Currently I just #to_json all options. But that's definitely weird name. I need a better idea.
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
Yurii Rashkovskii April 29th, 2008 @ 09:25 PM
- → State changed from “new” to “resolved”
Here is an example of new naming schema — "http://coolapp.com#user_has_many_items"
-
Yurii Rashkovskii May 13th, 2008 @ 03:13 PM
(from [07d858a8aa8c90771089dfa21abe0f2ac6fbc4a7]) better naming schema for association views [#25 state:resolved]
Please Login or create a free account to add a new comment.
You can update this ticket by sending an email to from your email client. (help)
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile »
StrokeDB is an embeddable distributed document database written in Ruby
